課程名稱 |
人類思考導論 Seminar on Human Thinking |
開課學期 |
101-1 |
授課對象 |
理學院 心理學系 |
授課教師 |
連韻文 |
課號 |
Psy5010 |
課程識別碼 |
227 U0290 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期二6,7,8(13:20~16:20) |
上課地點 |
南館S409 |
備註 |
總人數上限:10人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1011thinking |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
本課程為心理學的進階課程,在「雙重歷程」的架構下討論有關人類推理與決策等表現,旁及個別差異與理性等議題,期增進學生對相關理論與重要議題的理解。
|
課程目標 |
本課程為心理學的進階課程,在「雙重歷程」的架構下討論有關人類推理與決策等表現,旁及個別差異與理性等議題,期增進學生對相關理論與重要議題的理解。 |
課程要求 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
|
指定閱讀 |
|
參考書目 |
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (p. 512). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking : dual processes in reasoning
and judgement /. Essays in cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press,.
Manktelow, K. (Ed.). (2004). Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical
Perspectives (p. 388). Psychology Press.
以及指定期刊論文 |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
上課口頭報告 |
40% |
|
2. |
每週課前摘要、提問與課後心得 |
30% |
|
3. |
上課討論參與程度與貢獻 |
30% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
9/11 |
Introduation
本課程相關文獻下載頁面:
https://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/course/aeb3ba/webpages/references.html |
第2週 |
9/18 |
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for
the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological
Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
|
第3週 |
9/25 |
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (p. 512). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Chapter 1~4 |
第4週 |
10/02 |
Kahneman, D.(2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Chaps 5- 9 |
第5週 |
10/09 |
Thinking fast and slow chapter7~9
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. (2012). Spot the difference: distinguishing between two kinds of
processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 121–131. |
第6週 |
10/16 |
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind and Society, 11(1), 3–13.
Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109.
|
第7週 |
10/23 |
Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(6), 988–1010.
J Gore, E Sadler-Smith (2011). Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework Review of General Psychology 15 (4) p. 304-316
|
第8週 |
10/30 |
Stupple, E. J. N., Ball, L. J., Evans, J. S. B. T., & Kamal-Smith, E. (2011). When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 931–941.
J. St B. T. Evans (2007). Hypothetical thinking: dual processes in reasoning and judgment. Chap1-2.
|
第9週 |
11/06 |
Thompson, V., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: do you feel like it? Mind and Society, 11(1), 93–105.
Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2008). How smart do you need to be to get it wrong? The role of cognitive capacity in the development of heuristic-based judgment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(1), 18–36.
|
第10週 |
11/13 |
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31(2-3), 86–102.
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural f preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653-684.
|
第11週 |
11/20 |
Allen, A. P., & Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 109–118
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. a, Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 656–669. |
第12週 |
11/27 |
Thinking fast and slow chapter 10~12 |
第13週 |
12/04 |
Thinking fast and slow chapter 13~18
分組題目 |
第14週 |
12/11 |
各組實驗報告 |
第16週 |
12/25 |
Thinking fast and slow Choice |
第17週 |
1/01 |
元旦放假 |
第18週 |
1/8 |
期末考週 |
|